| |
Epiphany 4C 2007
It’s
a brave or a foolish preacher who attempts to say something fresh
about chestnuts such
as today’s Corinthians reading. It is unarguably amongst
the all time favourites of bible texts, right up there with the
23rd
psalm and the beatitudes in the popularity stakes.
In
our liturgical life, you’ll hear this glorious hymn to
love found most often at weddings. Some of you may remember
the stirring reading of the passage at the 1981 wedding of Prince
Charles and Dianna Spencer by the then Speaker of the House of
Commons
George Thomas, later Lord Tonypandy. As well as at weddings,
it sometimes also gets a Guernsey at funerals.
Perhaps
its very familiarity masks for us a little of the depth of its meaning.
So let’s take a moment today to unpack the
familiar words – and if I have nothing startlingly new to
say, then at the very least we can reflect afresh on Paul’s
glorious description of the essential nature and the power of love – that
special love called agape in the Greek of the New Testament, which
receives paradigm expression for us through the person and work
of Jesus our saviour.
The
passage speaks to us at least at three levels. First it gives us
a standard or measure by which we can gauge our own conduct
towards others. It’s not unusual to see tears in the eyes
of members of congregations as the reading unfolds. . . . Love
is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast,
it is not proud. It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is
not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not
delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects,
always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres. (NIV UK)
Is
the soul moved to weep because we know how easily we fall short
of its ideal in our relationships with those who are closest to
us – the one to whom we propose to commit in love for life;
the ones we presume to mourn? We set out with such high hopes for
ourselves and firm resolve in our relationships. But at the sharp
edge of the everyday things don’t always go as we want them
to, and our hopes and dreams can look all too ragged as they bump
up against life’s harsh realities. We seek the best of ourselves
and for our closest – too often we deliver second best.
At
the same time, the tears engendered by our engagement with Paul’s
hymn to love can be deeply consoling. Most of us have experienced
those life transforming moments when we tasted
its
truth; we have known the freedom that this love brings, we have
felt its healing power.
At
a second level, the Corinthian passage can offer us the deepest
personal consolation and security. Our patron John the Evangelist
tells us that ‘God is love, and those who live in love live
in God and God lives in them.’ No matter who we are, how
gifted we are, no matter how flawed we are, whatever our achievements
and whatever our failings our God, who is love, is ever kind and
patient with us, endless in mercy, not prone to anger or resentful
brooding. This God knows us intimately, at the deepest level, knows
all we are and all we can be – ‘before I formed you
in the womb I knew you’, he says to young Jeremiah as he
calls him to ministry. And this God who knows us is for us in love
and not against us – ‘I am with you to deliver you.’
When
life is really tough, when we struggle to keep head above water,
when it seems that everything is against us, our dearest
friends desert us, how comforting it can be to bathe in the love
of this God who loves us absolutely and beyond limit – who
keeps nothing back but gives his all to us. Ultimately we are
not alone. The deepest human drive to intimacy finds its expression
in our experience of the limitless love of God.
But
Paul is not just speaking to us as individuals. Here is the third
level of the reading, and it’s a staggering thought.
The love which Paul describes, the love which Jesus lived, such
love as this should mark the way we live as social beings. Christians
are called to love others as God has loved us. And this, it seems,
is a command of screaming impracticality.
For
we do not live in a world where love dominates. The world we inhabit
is too often a mean place, a loveless place, driven
by ideology, self interest, violence and hatred. It’s easy
to get caught up in the ways of the world, and act out its values,
voluntarily or involuntarily.
What
does our Christian profession have to do with the way we engage
with this world in our everyday life? Many would argue that
faith is not a real world issue. The spiritual and the secular
divide is an effective means of disempowering the primacy of faith.
We’ve all heard it…Religion and politics don’t
mix; The Church should concern itself with the soul and leave the
business of the world, the real world of race, nation, class, gender,
and money, especially money, to those who are equipped to deal
with it. Love seems to be so alien to the political processes and
global economics that one might seem a fool or worse to suggest
it has its proper place.
It’s not hard to make the case that our economic and social
way of life is not only joyless, but unkind, impatient, and rude.
There’s just too much arrogance, boasting, and pomposity
in human relations, in the media, in marketing. Just listen to
the radio or watch the TV – political posturing, aggressive
rudeness hiding under the cloak of investigative reporting.
Not
love forbearing, but resentment is spewed forth by sectarians who
would have us blame somebody – blame the government,
blame the opposition, blame the rich, blame the poor, blame the
parents or the children, blame the lawyers or the judges or the
politicians. It must be somebodies fault. So let’s blame.
Not
love delighting in truth, but a cult of deception marks so much
of our social discourse. The truth seems less important than
the spin. It’s not what is, rather it’s what you can
make ‘em believe. So, for example, the now generally accepted
notion of core and non core promises. It is almost as if we presume
that we are always being lied to.
Not enduring love, but the endless celebration of unfettered choice
and unrestrained accumulation grounds the so-called moral discourse
of modem times.
We Christians are called to make a difference in a world like
this. We are called into a community of love, and inevitably where
there is the love that Paul describes, there is a longing for justice,
and a determination to live in generosity and truth and integrity.
The challenge for us is to live out this love, first in the church,
in our dealings with each other, and then into the world, in the
way we live our everyday lives.
And for as long as we, in our public dealings with our fellow
Christians, fall short of our calling to live in love, by sectarian
abuse, by imputing bad motive, by undermining and criticising and
belittling, then we forsake our mission and spit in the face of
the Christ of God. For love is paramount.
Love never ends. But as for prophecies, they will come to an end;
as for tongues, they will cease; as for knowledge, it will come
to an end. For we know only in part, and we prophesy only in part;
but when the complete comes, the partial will come to an end.
Of
course it is not easy to live up to love’s high demand.
Jesus himself, after he set his mission statement of love by
announcing good news to the poor, release to the captives, recovery
of sight
to the blind, and freedom for the oppressed first amazed, then
angered his audience to the point where they threatened him with
death. He was, after all one of them, too ordinary and too close
to give such prophetic utterance. So it went when he began his
ministry.
And
so it may be today if we seek to live up to love’s high
ideal. Love confronts; but love endures. And in a world which largely
seems to have forgotten about the primacy of love, isn’t
it the most important thing that we in the church can do is to
live out this transforming reality, to the glory of God and for
the service of God’s people. Until we see the fulfilment
of Paul’s words; ‘And now faith, hope, and love abide,
these three; and the greatest of these is love.’
Reginald Fuller sees the central paragraph as a hymn which was
pre-formed in Hellenistic Jewish Christianity or even in Hellenistic
Judaism, which Paul adapted to the context of the dispute over charismata
in the Church at Corinth by adding the first and third parts. Reginald
H. Fuller, Preaching the Lectionary: The Word of God for the Church
Today (The Liturgical Press. 1984 (Revised Edition), pp. 455-458.
|